top of page
< Back

Accelerated Aging Methodology for Polymers: Limitations and the Physics-Based Alternative

Accelerated aging is supposed to simulate 10 years in 6 months. But Arrhenius assumes one mechanism, one temperature, and linear time scaling. None of those hold in real service.

📚 Peer-reviewed comparison: K-Load vs. ISO 11346 Arrhenius methodology | 📉 25–40% error reduction vs. Arrhenius in multi-stressor environments | ✅ K-Load accepted in regulatory submissions (DOE, USSF programs) | 🔬 Validated materials: EPDM, NBR (Perbunan), HNBR (Zetpol), FKM (Viton), FEPM (AFLAS), VMQ silicone, MDI-based PU, XLPE cable insulation

Accelerated Aging Methodology for Polymers | K-Load
Accelerated Aging Methodology for Polymers | K-Load
Why ISO 11346 Arrhenius accelerated aging fails for multi-stressor environments — and how K-Load's physics model replaces it. Free trial.
bottom of page